We appreciate your work on the Wiki, but some of your recent edits have been rather questionable. We noticed that on September 12, 2015, you deleted the affiliation section for over 30 characters. Then today, September 13, you put them back (see Tetsurō Kuroo for an example). Spamming is against our wiki's blocking policy. Before we issue a formal vandalism warning, though, I would just like for you to clarify the rationale behind these of your edits.
I found it strange that karasuno high players didn't have affiliation so i thought i should delete them to match the karasuno page.Then i tried to add the affiliation to karasuno players, but the content for that didn't exist.Because most of them had character infobox major;for example Oikawa page doesn't have affiliation because the template doesn't have it, but Kindaichi , whish is under character infobox minor, has it.After i noticed this, i put back affiliation to all the characters that i removed it from.I apologize that i made a mestake, but i think affiliation should be added to Character Infobox(Major) Template.Sorry about this reply being a bit too long and late.
Thanks for your reply. I will surely bring up your suggestion of maybe adding an "Affiliations" section to the info boxes for major characters. When you noticed the “Affiliations” discrepancy, though, the wiser move would have been to contact one of the admins instead of deleting that info from 30 something pages and then adding them back the next day. I would need to discuss with the other admins if your action warrants a vandalism warning.
With that said, I really appreciate everything you have done so far. With the new season coming up, our wiki’s traffic will (hopefully) increase. We want these new users to see a better wiki, and you are certainly helping with that effort.
Sorry if I'm butting in, but the reason the templates on the Karasuno member and Oikawa's pages don't have affiliation and don't really match the Minor character template is that back when the wiki was going through the huge renovation, the 2 templates were only made as drafts to demonstrate an idea to the former bureaucrat. They were later approved and used, but the renovators forgot to look them over before publishing them due to the numerous projects going on. Both templates have been edited several times since then but because there are still a lot of things to do on the wiki, the irregularities haven't really been touched on. But I do agree that affiliations should be added onto the new templates since it's a somewhat important detail.